Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?

« Some research now suggests that ChatGPT can estimate the quality of journal articles from their titles and abstracts. This has created the possibility to use ChatGPT quality scores, perhaps alongside citation-based formulae, to support peer review for research evaluation. Nevertheless, ChatGPT’s internal processes are effectively opaque, despite it writing a report to support its scores, and its biases are unknown. (…) »

source > arxiv.org, Mike Thelwall, Zeyneb Kurt, 14 novembre 2024, arXiv:2411.09768v1

Accueil