Could grant proposal reviews be made available openly?

« … This topic raises the attention of both the scientific community and civil society. For researchers, to ensure fairness and objectivity on the process and to the general public (taxpayers) to ensure that projects are approved on the merits and not for political reasons or to favor third parties, increasing society’s trust in scientific research.

A paper by Chris Woolston in Nature¹ analyzes the impact of two recently published articles on the opening of grant reviews and more, the possibility of changing the evaluation of proposals after publication of the results (…) »

source > blog.scielo, SciELO in Perspective, 20 mars 2015

• Mots-clés : 
• Chercheur,
• Etude,
• Evaluation,
• Open peer review,
• Peer review,
• Publication scientifique,
• Recherche,
• Société