06.11.2024
Mot-clé :
28.10.2024
Peer-reviewed preprints and the Publish-Review-Curate model
« The traditional scientific publication model, characterized by gate-keeping editorial decisions, has come under increasing criticism. Opponents argue that it is…11.04.2024
The role of non-scientific factors vis-a-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact
« (…) This study investigates the role of non-scientific attributes alongside quality scores from peer review in determining scholarly impact. Leveraging…11.03.2024
On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
« Amidst the ever-expanding realm of scientific production and the proliferation of predatory journals, the focus on peer review remains paramount…21.02.2024
Beyond journals and peer review: towards a more flexible ecosystem for scholarly communication
« This article challenges the assumption that journals and peer review are essential for developing,evaluating and disseminating scientific and other academic…07.07.2023
UKRI |Review of peer review
« This report presents the findings of a study commissioned by UKRI to review interventions to the peer review processes used…03.04.2023
Metrics and peer review agreement at the institutional level
« In the past decades, many countries have started to fund academic institutions based on the evaluation of their scientific performance.23.02.2023
Experimenting with open science practices at the STI 2023 conference
« As organizers of the STI 2023 conference, we introduce two open science experiments: We adopt a new…16.11.2022
DOAB officially launches its new service to further build trust in peer review and open access academic book publishing
« The Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB), a community-driven discovery service for open access books, is launching…06.10.2022
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
« Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps…20.09.2022
Strengthening Research Integrity: Improving peer review in publishing
« As peer review week begins, Michael Barber considers some recent advances to improve peer review processes in the scholarly publishing…09.06.2022
Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
« Reviewers do not only help editors to screen manuscripts for publication in academic journals; they also serve to increase the…05.01.2022
Preprint articles as a tool for teaching data analysis and scientific communication
« The skill of analyzing and interpreting research data is central to the scientific process, yet it is one of the…04.01.2022
Entretien : Denis Bourguet co-fondateur de Peer Community In [vidéo]
« Denis Bourguet est DR INRAE dans l’UMR CBGP. Depuis 5 ans il est le co-fondateur et co-manager (avec Thomas Guillemaud)…22.11.2021
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
« The amount and value of researchers’ peer review work is critical for academia and journal publishing. However, this labor is…30.08.2021
Introducing PREreview Communities
« What is a PREreview Community? PREreview Communities are preprint reviewing groups that form around an identity,…27.07.2021
TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production
« Advances in science and technology depend on the work of research teams and the publication of results through peer-reviewed articles…29.06.2021
Did You Ask for Citations? An Insight into Preprint Citations en route to Open Science
« This study investigates citation patterns between 2017 and 2020 for preprints published in three preprint servers, one specializing in biology…01.04.2021
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture
« One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer…12.03.2021
OASPA: Guest Post: Peer review in transition?
« (…) The functions of peer review in scholarly publishing have always been multiple, including the aim of improving the quality…oaspa.org, Ludo Waltman, Stephen Pinfield, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Helen Buckley Woods, 11 mars 2021
26.02.2021
Evaluating science: Opening a debate
« This article briefly reviews the long-lasting commitment of Social Science Information to the critical analysis of orders of knowledge and…journals.sagepub.com, David Jaclin, Peter Wagner, 18 février 2021, DOI: 10.1177/0539018421993021
16.02.2021
AI-assisted peer review
« The scientific literature peer review workflow is under strain because of the constant growth of submission volume. One response to…12.02.2021
How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable
« Since its onset, COVID-19 has significantly accelerated and expanded scientific publishing. Drawing on research into open peer review in medical…08.01.2021
Peer Community in
« Peer Community in (PCI) est un processus éditorial de science ouverte participant à la…fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_Community_in, dernière modification 8 janvier 2021
08.12.2020
Global first for UKRI – recording funding peer review contributions in ORCID records
« (…) UKRI have recently announced that they have implemented the ORCID reviewer recognition feature in their grants management system, Je-S.08.12.2020
eLife précurseur avec le système ‘Publish then review’ : la rédaction ne prend en compte que des pré-publications
« Les rédacteurs de eLife viennent de changer la politique de leur revue avec des explications très…02.12.2020
Meta-Research: Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
« Peer review practices differ substantially between journals and disciplines. This study presents the results of a survey of 322 editors…elifesciences.org, Daniel G Hamilton,, Hannah Fraser, Rink Hoekstra, Fiona Fidler, 19 novembre 2020
20.11.2020
The Enlightenment of Peer Review : How Academic Librarians Can Utilize Open Peer Review Methods to Advance Information Literacy
« In today’s world of digital scholarly publishing, it is increasingly clear that movements such as open access (OA), Open Science,…04.11.2020
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
« Stakeholders might have diverging or conflicting expectations about the functions that peer review should fulfil. We aimed to explore how…onlinelibrary.wiley.com, Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway, 28 septembre 2020
03.11.2020
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
« Clear and findable publishing policies are important for authors to choose appropriate journals for publication. We investigated the clarity of…20.10.2020
Parallel Peer Review at Cell Press: An Interview with Deborah Sweet
« Cell Press recently announced a new initiative called Community Review. The initiative tackles the core inefficiency…05.10.2020
Converting to Open Access. The Austrian Journal of Political Science (OZP) as a case study
« Open Access is a simple idea that has resulted in a confusing landscape of business models, competing policy prescriptions, and…webapp.uibk.ac.at, Thomas König, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.3184.vol49iss3
18.08.2020
Prix Liber : pour une science ouverte, transparente et gratuite
« Quatre chercheurs et ingénieurs INRAE ont été récompensés au niveau européen par le prix Liber de l’innovation (LIBER Award for…10.08.2020
Overlay model for peer review on repositories – open for public comment
« COAR is pleased to share with you a proposed model for a standardised approach to peer review of resources in…27.07.2020
Comparing journal-independent review services
(…) we’ve built a table to compare four services that allow authors to request journal-independent peer reviews: eLife’s…11.05.2020
Le peer-reviewing en quête d’un nouveau modèle [2/5] : PREreview.org
« Passer outre les grands éditeurs scientifiques tout en ouvrant l’évaluation à des communautés sous représentées dans le monde académique, c’est…01.04.2020
ENRESSH Report: Overview of Peer Review Practices in the SSH
« This report identifies the challenges particularly relevant for the SSH, such as different and thus often conflicting…24.03.2020
EPRIST – La conversation scientifique ouverte (.pdf)
« L’évaluation ouverte ou la révision ouverte de travaux pourrait être la prochaine révolution du libre accès. Alors que le Plan…09.03.2020
Emerald pilots crowd review process with Filestage to enhance peer review collaboration
« Emerald Publishing is piloting a crowd review process with Filestage to enhance the peer review process and improve the quality…27.02.2020
Le peer-reviewing en quête d’un nouveau modèle [1/5] : Peer Community In
« Et si l’avenir du peer-reviewing devait s’imaginer à l’écart des grands éditeurs scientifiques privés ? C’est l’une des convictions de…10.02.2020
Communiqué: Meeting participants agree to work together on a technical architecture for distributed peer review on repository resources
« On January 23-24, 2020, COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) convened a meeting to investigate the potential for a common,…06.02.2020
ACS Publications signs agreement with ORCID to recognize ACS reviewers
« The Publications Division of the American Chemical Society (ACS) is pleased to announce that reviewers of ACS journal articles can…06.12.2019
Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Peer Review (.pdf)
« This document summarises recent developments in the automation of the editorial and peer review process. It discusses the opportunities for…25.09.2019
Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process
« (…) The result of an examination of literature assisted the creation of a novel taxonomy of types of software available…19.09.2019
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
« Peer review is embedded in the core of our scholarly knowledge generation systems, conferring legitimacy on research while distributing academic…18.09.2019
Let’s Add Peer Review Information to ORCID Records
« As part of our Peer Review Week 2019 celebrations, we are happy to share this…17.09.2019
Quality, trust & peer review:researchers’ perspectives 10 years on
« Over the past 10 years, much has changed. Technological advances are transforming not only how research – and peer review…09.09.2019
Defining the role of the peer reviewer
« Despite peer reviewers being an integral cog in the biomedical publication machinery, there is little consensus on what their function…28.08.2019
PREreview: Help Us Change the « Who », « When », and « How » of Peer Review
« (…) PREreview seeks to diversify peer review by crowdsourcing preprint feedback to improve the quality of published scientific output, and…06.08.2019
Publons and ScholarOne join IOP on transparent peer review
« Publons and ScholarOne, both part of the Web of Science Group, have entered a partnership with IOP Publishing to introduce the…25.06.2019
Transpose – a new database of almost 3000 journal policies for peer review and preprints
« Publishers’ policies on pre-prints, citation, licensing and versioning can be at best hard to find and at times confusing. This…21.05.2019
Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing
« The changing world of scholarly communication and the emerging new wave of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to…02.05.2019
What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice
« We conducted a literature review of best practice in peer review. Following this research, we identified five principles for better…05.03.2019
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
« Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system…31.01.2019
Webinar on a Shared Infrastructure for Transparent and Transportable Peer Review (Blockchain)
« The project for a Shared Infrastructure on Transparent and Transportable Peer Review was started in March 2018, by Digital Science,…14.12.2018
Springer Nature and Publons Enter Wide-Ranging Partnership to Bring Greater Efficiency and Recognition to Peer Review
« The burden on the peer review community is increasing as the volume of published research articles grows. Research output is…08.11.2018
SAE International and Publons Sign Agreement to Improve Recognition of Journal Peer Reviewers
« SAE International has partnered with Publons to help train and recognize reviewers of its journals. The initial…06.11.2018
Is peer review coming out of the shadows?
« The concept of publishing peer review comments alongside an article, to increase transparency in the publication process, is gathering momentum.20.09.2018
Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers
« The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), like many other research funders, requires its grantees to make papers…18.09.2018
Bringing Greater Transparency to Peer Review: Wiley and Clarivate Analytics Partner to Launch Innovative Open Peer Review
« New, scalable open peer review workflow using Publons and ScholarOne technology now live across Wiley’s prestigious journal Clinical Genetics John…11.09.2018
Peer Review Week 2018: new and revised COPE resources: Diversity in Peer Review [Podcast]
« (…) This podcast explores some of the formal and informal ways that institutions contribute to diversity in the pool of…publicationethics.org, Charon Pierson, Professor Andy Hor, 6 septembre 2018
10.09.2018
Publons: Global State of Peer Review report
« We investigate the supply, demand, quality, and efficiency of scholarly peer review to bring greater transparency to the process What…03.09.2018