19.09.2019
Mot-clé : peer-review
18.09.2019
Let’s Add Peer Review Information to ORCID Records
« As part of our Peer Review Week 2019 celebrations, we are happy to share this…17.09.2019
Quality, trust & peer review:researchers’ perspectives 10 years on
« Over the past 10 years, much has changed. Technological advances are transforming not only how research – and peer review…09.09.2019
Defining the role of the peer reviewer
« Despite peer reviewers being an integral cog in the biomedical publication machinery, there is little consensus on what their function…28.08.2019
PREreview: Help Us Change the « Who », « When », and « How » of Peer Review
« (…) PREreview seeks to diversify peer review by crowdsourcing preprint feedback to improve the quality of published scientific output, and…06.08.2019
Publons and ScholarOne join IOP on transparent peer review
« Publons and ScholarOne, both part of the Web of Science Group, have entered a partnership with IOP Publishing to introduce the…18.07.2019
Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models
« (…) This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of OPR adoption, its early adopters and the implementation models used. We…25.06.2019
Transpose – a new database of almost 3000 journal policies for peer review and preprints
« Publishers’ policies on pre-prints, citation, licensing and versioning can be at best hard to find and at times confusing. This…21.05.2019
Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing
« The changing world of scholarly communication and the emerging new wave of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to…02.05.2019
What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice
« We conducted a literature review of best practice in peer review. Following this research, we identified five principles for better…05.03.2019
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
« Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system…15.02.2019
Open peer review: pilot studies reveal promising findings
« Last year, an open letter recognising the benefits of transparency in peer review processes was…31.01.2019
Webinar on a Shared Infrastructure for Transparent and Transportable Peer Review (Blockchain)
« The project for a Shared Infrastructure on Transparent and Transportable Peer Review was started in March 2018, by Digital Science,…31.01.2019
Peer Review ouvert : accepté par auteurs et relecteurs… à promouvoir car le peer review aveugle n’est pas éthique
« Le peer-review ouvert consiste à mettre en ligne les avis des relecteurs (signés ou non signés) avec l’article publié, ainsi…14.12.2018
Springer Nature and Publons Enter Wide-Ranging Partnership to Bring Greater Efficiency and Recognition to Peer Review
« The burden on the peer review community is increasing as the volume of published research articles grows. Research output is…08.11.2018
SAE International and Publons Sign Agreement to Improve Recognition of Journal Peer Reviewers
« SAE International has partnered with Publons to help train and recognize reviewers of its journals. The initial…06.11.2018
Is peer review coming out of the shadows?
« The concept of publishing peer review comments alongside an article, to increase transparency in the publication process, is gathering momentum.20.09.2018
Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers
« The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), like many other research funders, requires its grantees to make papers…18.09.2018
Bringing Greater Transparency to Peer Review: Wiley and Clarivate Analytics Partner to Launch Innovative Open Peer Review
« New, scalable open peer review workflow using Publons and ScholarOne technology now live across Wiley’s prestigious journal Clinical Genetics John…11.09.2018
Peer Review Week 2018: new and revised COPE resources: Diversity in Peer Review [Podcast]
« (…) This podcast explores some of the formal and informal ways that institutions contribute to diversity in the pool of…publicationethics.org, Charon Pierson, Professor Andy Hor, 6 septembre 2018
10.09.2018
Publons: Global State of Peer Review report
« We investigate the supply, demand, quality, and efficiency of scholarly peer review to bring greater transparency to the process What…03.09.2018
La publication des avis des reviewers se généralise…. le peer-review ouvert est éthique, intègre et transparent
« Avec la signature de V Kiermer, groupe PLOS, ce sont 7 revues qui rejoignent les revues ayant décidé de mettre…28.08.2018
The rent’s too high: Self-archive for fair online publication costs
« The main contributors of scientific knowledge, researchers, generally aim to disseminate their findings far and wide. And yet, publishing companies…09.08.2018
Elsevier achète Aries : l’édition scientifique s’interroge sur son avenir
« L’éditeur scientifique Elsevier s’est offert la société Aries Systems, à l’origine d’outils informatiques de publication de documents et d’articles. Autrement…03.08.2018
Elsevier to acquire Aries Systems, a best-in-class publication workflow solutions provider
« Elsevier, the global information analytics business specializing in science and health, today announced it has signed a…31.07.2018
Beyond #FakeScience: How to Overcome Shallow Certainty in Scholarly Communication
« Science journalism in Germany in the last days was awash with a report on “predatory publishers” and an integrity ‘crisis’…30.07.2018
Reviewing the review process: Investigation of researchers’ opinions on different methods of peer review
« Peer review is considered the gold standard of scientific publishing. Trust in the traditional system of editor – blind-reviewer…06.07.2018
Ten considerations for open peer review
« Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open research, is on the rise. It aims…29.06.2018
Preprints and peer review – feedback from the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMPP [video]
« Mary Yianni, Publisher at Taylor & Francis, reviews the different models of peer review and explains the…11.06.2018
Crossref facilitates the use of essential peer review information for scholarly communications
« The new exposure of peer review information through its public API provides opportunities for discoverability, analysis, and integration of tools.23.05.2018
Peer-review under review – A statistical study on proposal ranking at ESO. Part I: the pre-meeting phase
« Peer review is the most common mechanism in place for assessing requests for resources in a large variety of scientific…arxiv.org, Ferdinando Patat, 15 mai 2018, arXiv:1805.06981 [physics.soc-ph]
11.05.2018
Valoriser le travail des reviewers. Retours d’expérience de chercheurs sur le peer review, Publons
« Dans le cadre de la journée d’étude du 27 mars 2018 « Le peer review à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux…12.04.2018
Le « peer review » à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux et évolutions », Journée d’étude, Urfist, 27 mars 2018 [diaporamas]
« (…) Dans quelle mesure le paradigme de l’open science peut-il apporter des réponses à la crise du peer review ? Par…26.03.2018
PEERE International Conference on Peer Review, Rome, 7-9 March 2018 [diaporamas]
« Organised by COST Action PEERE, the conference offered scholars, practitioners and science stakeholders the…08.03.2018
Why We Need to Explore Blockchain Technology to Connect Researchers and Research
« (…) ORCID is eager to participate in projects that enrich the PID ecosystem. That includes looking at what…30.01.2018
OpenUP Pilot1: Open Peer Review for Conferences
« (…) An important aspect of the process of doing science is peer reviewing. It is one of the most important…15.12.2017
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
« Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of…14.11.2017
Un nouveau modèle de peer review testé par des revues Elsevier et Springer : RMR (Results Masked Reviews) ou RFR (Results Free Reviews) ?
« (…) Ce sont, encore une fois, des revues de psychologie et de management qui innovent. Le J…18.10.2017
The next stage of SocArXiv’s development: bringing greater transparency and efficiency to the peer review process
« Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platform has operated…28.07.2017
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
« Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the…19.06.2017
L’expertise en sciences ou comment se décide ce qui est publiable : noblesse et dérives
« (…) De plus en plus de manuscrits sont soumis pour publication, et l’éditeur est bien loin de connaître vraiment (scientifiquement,…13.06.2017
Peer Review Evaluation (PRE) and HighWire Press partner to increase transparency for peer review
« HighWire Press announces a partnership with Peer Review Evaluation (PRE) to offer turn-key integration of PRE, a transparency service from…06.06.2017
Web of Science owner buys up booming peer-review platform
« The owner of the vast science-citation database Web of Science — Clarivate Analytics — is buying up a firm that…29.05.2017
What might peer review look like in 2030?
« ‘What might peer review look like in 2030’ examines how peer review can be improved for future generations of academics and…16.05.2017
What it was like to be peer reviewed in the 1860s
« In January 1861 John Tyndall, a physicist at London’s Royal Institution, submitted a paper to the Philosophical Transactions of the…03.05.2017
OpenAIRE survey: open peer review is moving mainstream
« OpenAIRE today releases the results of its survey conducted in Autumn 2016, which gauged the views towards open peer review…28.04.2017
What is open peer review? A systematic review
“(…) Open peer review” (OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has neither a standardized definition nor an…f1000research.com, Ross-Hellauer T, 27 avril 2017, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.1
16.03.2017
Opening scholarly communication in social sciences by connecting collaborative authoring to peer review
« The objective of the OSCOSS research project on « Opening Scholarly Communication in the Social Sciences » is to build a coherent…09.02.2017
MIROR : découvrez cet excellent projet européen, et apprenez à bien organiser des Journal Clubs
« (…) Les Journal Clubs existent dans de nombreuses universités, et départements hospitaliers quand les praticiens, les chercheurs et…16.12.2016
Les anniversaires des revues sont des occasions : Academic Medicine a 90 ans et nous offre de bons articles
« Le 90ème anniversaire de la revue Academic Medicine permet d’avoir accès gracieusement aux articles sélectionnés par la rédaction.14.12.2016
mSphereDirect: Author-Initiated Peer Review of Manuscripts
« (…) With these two elements in hand—preprints and needed innovation in peer review—we have decided to embark on an experiment…15.11.2016
Évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de l’expérimentation à la modélisation
« Julien Bordier, docteur en sociologie, a publié sur HAL un article intitulé « Évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de…27.10.2016
Artificial Intelligence Integration Allows Publishers a First Look at Meta Bibliometric Intelligence
« Aries Systems Corporation today announces the integration of Meta Bibliometric Intelligence into Editorial Manager, Aries’ industry-leading manuscript and…23.09.2016
OpenAIRE’s Experiments in Open Peer Review / Report
« As part of its mission to further Open Science and investigate how openness and transparency can improve…23.09.2016
Où publier : vers la reconnaissance du reviewing au Cirad
« Dans le cadre de la semaine Peer Review Week 2016 du 19 au 25 septembre, le…21.09.2016
EPRIST – Avec le brevet américain 9.430.468 , Elsevier se dote d’une arme défensive pour contrer à terme les logiques de peer – reviewing ouvert
« (…) Entre le développement d’une stratégie défensive de ses intérêts à long terme et la gestion à court terme de…eprist.fr, Michel Vajou, Analyse I/IST-n°20-14 septembre 2016
09.09.2016
OpenAIRE survey on attitudes to Open Peer Review
« OpenAIRE invites you to participate in a brief survey on attitudes to Open Peer Review: https://www.soscisurvey.de/OPR/…01.09.2016
Elsevier’s New Patent for Online Peer Review Throws a Scare Into Open-Source Advocates
« Patents on software can be controversial. And often, so is the company Elsevier, the giant journal publisher.27.07.2016
Over two thirds of researchers who’ve never peer reviewed would like to, new research reveals
« Published today is Peer review: a global view, bringing together primary research on researchers’ motivations behind…20.04.2016
The History of Scientific Publishing: An interview with Aileen Fyfe
« Have you ever wondered about the origins of scientific publishing, and how the field changed over time? In this…19.04.2016
Open peer review : from an experiment to a model: A narrative of an open peer review experimentation
« This article narrates the development of the experimentation of an open peer review and open commentary protocols. This…https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/, version 1, Julien Bordet, 16 avril 2016
08.02.2016
Une nouvelle façon de publier la recherche ?
» Annoncé depuis quelques mois sur Twitter, RIO pour “Research Ideas and Outcomes” se présente comme un “journal” d’un genre…http://ist.blogs.inra.fr, Dominique L’Hostis, Marianne Peiffer et Sylvie Zasser, 03 fevrier 2016.
01.02.2016
Wiley survey examines how best to support peer reviewers
« The results of a recent survey to appear in Learned Publishing highlight how the peer review process—when research…18.01.2016
OpenEdition and OpenAIRE – experiments in open peer review
» As part of OpenAIRE2020, OpenEdition, in association with the Couperin consortium and the environmental…17.12.2015