« We applaud the cOAlition S’s efforts towards a system of scholarly publishing that is more accessible, efficient, fair, and transparent. We appreciate this opportunity to provide feedback on the Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S. We wholeheartedly support a vision of a scholarly publishing system that…
« The recently published guidance for the implementation of Plan S offers welcome new details on how full and immediate Open Access to research publications would be achieved under this new initiative.
As LIBER stated in September, when Plan S was first announced,…
« Wellcome, in partnership with UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the Association of Learned & Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP), have engaged Information Power to explore a range of potential strategies and business models through which learned societies can transition to Open Access and adapt and thrive under…
« The VSNU endorses the objectives of and has been actively involved in the developments on Open Science as stated in the National Plan Open Science (NPOS). (…) »
Universities support Plan S (…)
Achieving Open Access ambitions (…)
Areas for attention in Plan S (…)
Launch of pilot project ‘You share,…
« A joint response to the implementation guidance for Plan S has today been issued by three organisations representing early-career and senior researchers in Europe. The response by the European Council of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers (Eurodoc), the Marie Curie Alumni Association (MCAA), and the Young Academy…
« Le Comité pour la Science ouverte apporte des préconisations sur les 10 points du Plan S en réponse à une demande de l’ANR. (…) »
« Le Comité pour la Science ouverte publie une courte note en réponse à la consultation en ligne de la cOAlition S sur le Guide d’application du Plan S, publié fin novembre 2018.
Cette note met l’accent sur les éléments qui ne sont pas assez…
« (…) Firstly, both initiatives have a common goal: to make Open Access a reality. However, Plan S and AmeliCA imply two very different visions and two conceptualizations on the circulation of scientific knowledge. What is the main difference between them? How is it possible that, arising almost simultaneously and with…
« Le plan S a pour objectif de rendre librement accessibles et réutilisables les publications scientifiques financées sur fonds publics, en Europe et dans le monde. Il s’agit d’une démarche basée sur le volontariat des financeurs. A ce jour, le plan S a été signé par 13 financeurs nationaux de la…
« (…) Harvard Library and the MIT Libraries are committed to fostering a scholarly communications environment which advances the values of openness, equitable access, transparency, responsible stewardship, and flexible reuse. Aligned with these commitments, we are in broad support of Plan S and its goals to ensure that publicly funded research…
