« We welcome Plan S as a ‘decisive step towards the realisation of full open access’, in particular the push it provides towards realization of a research process based on the principles of open science. This is fully aligned with our mission to bring scientists together to share work as rapidly…
« The discussions around Plan S are voluminous. On 8 February 2019, the opportunity to provide feedback on Plan S closed.
We have been attempting to maintain a list of commentary and news stories on Plan S at the end of one of our blogs: Most…
« Springer Nature welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the cOAlition S Implementation Guidance and contribute to the discussion on how the transition to Open Access (OA) can be accelerated.Our submission below focuses mainly on the second question posed in the consultation: Are there other mechanisms or requirements funders should…
« En 2018, la cOAlition S, consortium européen en faveur de l’open access à la recherche publique, publiait le Plan S. Cette initiative inédite à l’échelle européenne fait la promotion de 10 principes ayant vocation à faire de l’open access une réalité d’ici 2020.
Les…
« L’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) a apporté sa contribution à la consultation publique sur le guide d’application du Plan S lancé fin novembre 2018 par la cOAlition S. Cette consultation visait à clarifier et à identifier les éventuels points manquants du guide, qui précise les modalités de mise en…
« The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the recently published guidance to implement Plan S. Underscoring our response is the fact that STM is strongly supportive of Open Access, and of the overriding ambition of Plan S to expand access to…
« The mathematical community has been for a long time on the forefront of establishing an accessible, efficient, fair and transparent scholarly publishing system. The EMS and its Publications and Electronic Dissemination Committee are in favour of Open Access to the scientific literature. They have given a detailed feedback on Plan…
« Jan Erik Frantsvåg et Tormod Strømme, des bibliothécaires norvégiens, ont fait une brève étude de la compatibilité du plan S avec les revues du DOAJ. Ils ont analysé 10 des 14 critères du plan concernant les revues pour le corpus des revues du DOAJ. Ces critères sont pour moitié d’ordre…
« EUA has presented a comprehensive response to the “Plan S” consultation launched by Science Europe. Plan S is an initiative for Open Access publishing launched in 2018 by an international group of research funders (Coalition S). EUA has a special interest in Plan S as it complements…
« This is a slightly updated version of the COAR initial feedback published on December 13, 2018.(…) »