ENRESSH Report: Overview of Peer Review Practices in the SSH

« This report identifies the challenges particularly relevant for the SSH, such as different and thus often conflicting research paradigms or epistemological styles of reviewers
and applicants or authors; difficulty in many SSH disciplines to define and evaluate research methodology compared to STEM disciplines; the lack of the idea of linear progress and a much longer time span necessary to evaluate academic impact of publications; the diversity of publication outputs and specific importance of books or monographs; the importanceof local languages; challenges related to recent developments in research and its evaluation related to growing interdisciplinarity and Open Science turn. (…) »

source > enressh.eu, 31 mars 2020