An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard Psychology literature with Registered Reports

« When studies with positive results that support the tested hypotheses have a higher probability of being published than studies with negative results, the literature will give a distorted view of the evidence for scientific claims. Psychological scientists have been concerned about the degree of distortion in their literature due to publication bias and inflated Type-1 error rates. Registered Reports were developed with the goal to minimise such biases: In this new publication format, peer review and the decision to publish take place before the study results are known. (…) »

source >, Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M., & Lakens, D. (2020, February 5),