The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism

« Over the past decade, megajournals have expanded in popularity and established a legitimate niche in academic publishing. Leveraging advantages of digital publishing, megajournals are characterized by large publication volume, broad interdisciplinary scope, and peer‐review filters that select primarily for scientific soundness as opposed to novelty or originality. These publishing innovations are complementary and competitive vis‐à‐vis traditional journals. We analyze how megajournals (PLOS One, Scientific Reports) are represented in different fields relative to prominent generalist journals (Nature, PNAS, Science) and “quasi‐megajournals” (Nature Communications, PeerJ). (…) »

Source > asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com, Kyle Siler, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2019;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24299