23.07.2019
Plan S Version 2 and the Cost of Quality
« Much has been said about Plan S, both encouraging and critical. The relative preponderance of criticism – notably by academics, who ought to be key beneficiaries – has been frustrating to the plan’s backers, who see it as a long-overdue concerted effort to support a global transition to open access (OA) without paywalls that hamper research progress and without excessive publishing profit. Those of us who support the principle of OA – and the life sciences journals that I represent at EMBO Press certainly do – struggle to respond to Plan S. (…) »
source > scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org, Bernd Pulverer, 22 juillet 2019
