Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers

« Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system on a number of entities. One key element is represented by peer-reviewers, whose demand increases at an even higher pace than that of publications, since more than one reviewer per paper is needed and not all papers that get reviewed get published. The relatively recent Publons platform allows for unprecedented insight into the usual ‘blindness’ of the peer-review system. At a time where the world’s top peer-reviewers are announced and celebrated, we have taken a step back in order to attempt a partial mapping of their profiles to identify trends and key dimensions of this community of ‘super-reviewers’. (…) »

source > mdpi.com, Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye, 4 mars 2019, Publications 2019, 7(1), 15; doi: 10.3390/publications7010015

Accueil