« Dans le cadre de sa campagne d’évaluation 2022-2023 (vague C), le Hcéres transforme sa méthodologie. Le 15 juin, l’institution a convié l’ensemble des parties prenantes de l’évaluation de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche afin que toutes puissent s’exprimer sur les évolutions lancées. Première étape de discussions bilatérales à venir.
« This report provides stakeholders involved in research evaluation reforms with a set of guidelines that aim at fostering both Open Science and gender equality. Both topics are key dimensions in the implementation of a new European Research Area and provide policy and decision makers, funders as well as researchers with…
« L’Université de Lorraine a adhéré à la Déclaration de San Francisco (DORA). Initiative mondiale couvrant toutes les disciplines universitaires, l’UL au travers du DORA fait le choix d’affirmer la nécessité de transformer les méthodes d’évaluation des résultats de la recherche scientifique.
Crée en 2012, la déclaration de San Francisco…
« A conference on Responsible Research Assessment was held with the support of the Global Research Council from 23 to 27 November 2020. This report presents the context for the conference, some key analytics and the main discussion outcomes. It also proposes next steps for the GRC. (…) ».
Voir aussi :
« This letter is a call to the Spanish scientific authorities to abandon current research evaluation policies, which are based on an excessive and indiscriminate use of bibliometric indicators for nearly all areas of scientific activity. This narrow evaluation focus is especially applied to assess the individual performance of researchers. To…
« Le blog Ouvrir la science a publié la traduction d’une synthèse très intéressante du rapport de Knowledge Exchange : Openness Profile: Modelling research evaluation for open scholarship.
Ce rapport propose un modèle de référence appelé Openness Profile pour l’évaluation de la…
« This report is a deliverable of EOSC Co-Creation projects (i) “European overview of career merit systems » and (ii) “Vision for research data in research careers”, funded by the EOSC Co-Creation funding. Further information on these projects can be found here: https://avointiede.fi/en/networks/eosc-co-creation (…) »
« Since the 1950s, citation impact has been the dominant metric by which science is quantitatively evaluated. But research contributions play distinct roles in the unfolding drama of scientific debate, agreement and advance, and institutions may value different kinds of advances. Computational power, access to citation data and an array of…
« Basé sur une étude de 18 mois comprenant des entretiens, des ateliers et des groupes de discussion (80 participants, 48 organismes), le rapport de Knowledge Exchange Openness Profile: Modelling research evaluation for open scholarship propose l’élaboration d’un portefeuille numérique, ou profil d’ouverture, une ressource numérique dans laquelle…
The Openness Profile (OP) will be a digital resource in which a research contributor’s outputs and activities that support openness would be accessible in a single place.
The activities of scholarship go far beyond those typically used in the evaluation events that feed into hiring, promotion, and funding activities.…
