Open science practices in the false memory literature

« In response to the replication crisis in psychology, the scientific community has advocated open science practices to promote transparency and reproducibility. Although existing reviews indicate inconsistent and generally low adoption of open science in psychology, a current-day, detailed analysis is lacking. Recognising the significant impact of false memory research in legal contexts, we conducted a preregistered systematic review to assess the integration of open science practices within this field, analysing 388 publications from 2015 to 2023 (including 15 replications and 3 meta-analyses). Our findings indicated a significant yet varied adoption of open science practices. (…) »

source > tandfonline.com, Wiechert, S., Leistra, P., Ben-Shakhar, G., Pertzov, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2024). Open science practices in the false memory literature. Memory, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108

• Mots-clés : 
• Open Science,
• Pre-registration,
• Replication,
• Science ouverte,
• Study quality