Sciences biomédicales

27/02/2020

Revues et Covid-19 : ‘hot papers’, peer-review simplifié, articles gratuits, altmetric en hausse et compétition sévère

« Suivre l’épidémie de Coronavirus à travers les revues scientifiques est possible, mais la surinformation tue l’information. Que se passe-t-il ? Les revues doivent suivre l’actualité, s’adresser au lectorat chinois, attirer les articles à tout prix, etc..  Nous avons décrit la compétition NEJM / Lancet sur la…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
12/02/2020

Change in Format, Register and Narration Style in the Biomedical Literature: A 1948 Example

« Scientific communication has evolved over time and the formats of scientific writing, including its stylistic modules, have changed accordingly. Research articles from the past fit a research world that had not been taken over by the internet, electronic searches, the new media and even the science mass production of today…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
09/01/2020

Open forensic science

« The mainstream sciences are experiencing a revolution of methodology. This revolution was inspired, in part, by the realization that a surprising number of findings in the bioscientific literature could not be replicated or reproduced by independent laboratories. In response, scientific norms and practices are rapidly moving towards openness. These reforms…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
17/12/2019

Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study

« Open access (OA) journals are becoming a publication standard for health research, but it is not clear how they differ from traditional subscription journals in the quality of research reporting. We assessed the completeness of results reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in these journals. (…) »

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
09/09/2019

Defining the role of the peer reviewer

« Despite peer reviewers being an integral cog in the biomedical publication machinery, there is little consensus on what their function involves. To address this question, Ketevan Glonti and colleagues, examined articles and grey literature for statements describing the roles, tasks and competencies of peer reviewers of biomedical journals. (…) »

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet