Sciences biomédicales

24/06/2019

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

« Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the reader’s ability to independently interpret data and reproduce findings.…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
20/11/2018

Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research

« Predatory journals (PJ) exploit the open-access model promising high acceptance rate and fast track publishing without proper peer review. At minimum, PJ are eroding the credibility of the scientific literature in the health sciences as they actually boost the propagation of errors. In this article, we identify issues with PJ…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
27/08/2018

Towards a culture of open science and data sharing in health and medical research

« This thesis investigated the factors that contribute to the cultural shift towards open science and data sharing in health and medical research, with a focus on the role health and medical journals play. The findings of this research demonstrate that journal data sharing policies are not effective and that journals…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
20/08/2018

Bon rapport « Science Open by Design » avec des recommandations qui pourraient paraître évidentes et de bon sens

« Comment traduire ‘Open Science by Design’ : La science ouverte par conception. Pas facile. La science ouverte change rapidement et profondément nos pratiques. Ce rapport publié par NAP (National Academies Press), accessible gratuitement, a été le fruit d’un travail financé par la Fondation John Arnold. Il…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
10/08/2018

Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing

« The importance of post-publication peer review (PPPR) as a type of knowledge exchange has been emphasized by several authorities in research publishing, yet biomedical journals do not always facilitate this type of publication.

Here we report our experience publishing a commentary intended to offer constructive feedback on a previously published…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet