Article : Studying ‘predatory publishing’ in the context of research evaluation: conceptual and methodological challenges

Over the past years, the phenomenon of ‘predatory publishing’ has undergone fundamental changes raising pressing methodological and conceptual challenges for its study, particularly in the context of research evaluation. The complex constellation of commercial, evaluative, and scholarly actors and logics now involved necessitates an interdisciplinary, geographically-diverse, and collaborative approach to studying scholarly – and especially ‘predatory’ – publishing

source > academic.oup.com, Dimity Stephen, Meta Cramer, Emanuel Kulczycki, Martin Reinhart, Federico Vasen, Jakub Krzeski, Rita Faria, Moumita Koley, Marilena Drymioti, Research Evaluation, Volume 35, 2026, rvag025, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag025

• Mots-clés : 
• Editeurs prédateurs,
• Evaluation de la recherche,
• Revue scientifique