« Peer review is the most common mechanism in place for assessing requests for resources in a large variety of scientific disciplines. One of the strongest criticisms to this paradigm is the limited reproducibility of the process, especially at largely oversubscribed facilities. In this and in a subsequent paper we address…
« Dans le cadre de la journée d’étude du 27 mars 2018 « Le peer review à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux et évolutions » (consulter les supports ; consulter les tweets) organisée par l’Unité régionale de formation à l’information scientifique et technique de…
« (…) Dans quelle mesure le paradigme de l’open science peut-il apporter des réponses à la crise du peer review ? Par ailleurs, de quoi l’open peer review est-il le nom ? Quels sont les impacts sur le peer review de la logique de décloisonnement inhérente à l’open science ? De quelle manière…
« Organised by COST Action PEERE, the conference offered scholars, practitioners and science stakeholders the chance to meet and share evidence on peer review in different fields, such as medicine, computer science, social sciences or humanities. »
« (…) ORCID is eager to participate in projects that enrich the PID ecosystem. That includes looking at what blockchain can offer us, even if it’s clearly in a tech hype cycle. One such project is Digital Science’s Peer Review Blockchain initiative,…
« (…) An important aspect of the process of doing science is peer reviewing. It is one of the most important tools for quality assurance of the scientific method. The traditional approach to peer review is single- or double blinded reviewing done by a small group of appointed reviewers. (…) »
« Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors, reviewers and publishers has been undertaken. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, conducted for the OpenAIRE2020 project during September and…
« (…) Ce sont, encore une fois, des revues de psychologie et de management qui innovent. Le Journal of Vocational Behavior a déjà 3 articles publiés après RMR. Des instructions aux auteurs précises expliquent le process qui est similaire aux Registered Reports, sauf…
« Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platform has operated alongside the peer-review journal system rather than seriously disrupting it. Looking ahead to the next stage of its development, Philip Cohen considers how SocArXiv might challenge the peer review system…
« Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure? Does it perform to the high standards with which…
