« The main contributors of scientific knowledge, researchers, generally aim to disseminate their findings far and wide. And yet, publishing companies have largely kept these findings behind a paywall. With digital…
« L’éditeur scientifique Elsevier s’est offert la société Aries Systems, à l’origine d’outils informatiques de publication de documents et d’articles. Autrement dit, Aries Systems permettait aux auteurs de mettre en ligne…
« Elsevier, the global information analytics business specializing in science and health, today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Aries Systems, a…
« Science journalism in Germany in the last days was awash with a report on “predatory publishers” and an integrity ‘crisis’ for German science. (…)
Since the value of mutual review…
« Peer review is considered the gold standard of scientific publishing. Trust in the traditional system of editor – blind-reviewer – author is still high, but it’s authority is in…
« Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open research, is on the rise. It aims to bring greater transparency and participation to formal and informal…
« Mary Yianni, Publisher at Taylor & Francis, reviews the different models of peer review and explains the emerging role of preprints in biomedical sciences, including feedback from…
« The new exposure of peer review information through its public API provides opportunities for discoverability, analysis, and integration of tools.
In response to requests from the community for flexible registering…
« Peer review is the most common mechanism in place for assessing requests for resources in a large variety of scientific disciplines. One of the strongest criticisms to this paradigm is…
« Dans le cadre de la journée d’étude du 27 mars 2018 « Le peer review à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux et évolutions » (consulter les supports ;
