Ressources et outils

Informez-vous et montez en compétences grâce aux webinaires, ateliers, formations et outils proposés dans les thématiques de la science ouverte, la gestion des données ou encore dans le domaine du numérique.
26/08/2014

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Library Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium (.pdf)

« … This volume, the NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Library Edition, examines key trends, significant challenges, and emerging technologies for their potential impact on academic and research libraries worldwide. While there are many local factors affecting libraries, there are also issues that transcend regional boundaries and common questions; it was with these questions in mind that this…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
31/07/2014

Building a Disciplinary Metadata Standards Directory – Alexander Ball, Sean Chen, Jane Greenberg, Cristina Perez, Keith Jeffery, Rebecca Koskela

« Abstract

The Research Data Alliance (RDA) Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (MSDWG) is building a directory of descriptive, discipline-specific metadata standards. The purpose of the directory is to promote the discovery, access and use of such standards, thereby improving the state of research data interoperability and reducing duplicative…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
31/07/2014

Persistent Identifiers for Scholarly Assets and the Web: The Need for an Unambiguous Mapping – Herbert Van de Sompel, Robert Sanderson, Harihar Shankar, Martin Klein

« Abstract

Persistent IDentifiers (PIDs), such as DOIs, Handles and ARK identifiers, play a significant role in the identification of a wide variety of assets that are created and used in scholarly endeavours, including research papers, datasets, images, etc. Motivated by concerns about long-term persistence, among others, PIDs are…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
29/07/2014

Data Producers Courting Data Reusers: Two Cases from Modeling Communities – Jillian Wallis

« Abstract

Data sharing is a difficult process for both the data producer and the data reuser. Both parties are faced with more disincentives than incentives. Data producers need to sink time and resources into adding metadata for data to be findable and usable, and there is no promise…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
29/07/2014

Cross-Linking Between Journal Publications and Data Repositories: A Selection of Examples – Sarah Callaghan, Jonathan Tedds, Rebecca Lawrence, Fiona Murphy, Timothy Roberts, Will Wilcox

« Abstract

This article provides a selection of examples of the many ways that a link can be made between a journal article (whether in a data journal or otherwise) and a dataset held in a data repository. In some cases the method of linking is well established, while…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
29/07/2014

Building a Bridge Between Journal Articles and Research Data: The PKP-Dataverse Integration Project – Eleni Castro, Alex Garnett

« Abstract

A growing number of funding agencies and international scholarly organizations are requesting that research data be made more openly available to help validate and advance scientific research. Thus, this is an opportune moment for research data repositories to partner with journal editors and publishers in order to…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
28/07/2014

Conference Paper: “ISNI and VIAF – Transforming Ways of Trustfully Consolidating Identities” (Metadata) – Anila Angjeli, Andrew Mac Ewan, Vincent Boulet

« Abstract

This article presents ISNI and VIAF as major initiatives leveraging the library Authority control. They are significantly changing the international landscape of bibliographic control addressing the challenge of reliably identifying people in the rapidly emerging global knowledge network

Both systems are built on…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet
28/07/2014

Working Paper: “Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a Low Cost Bibliometric Tool” – Alberto Martín-Martín, Juan Manuel Ayllón, Enrique Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

« Abstract

We analyse the main features of the third edition of Google Scholar Metrics (GSM), released in June 2014, focusing on its more important changes, strengths, and weaknesses. Additionally, we present some figures that outline the dimensions of this new edition, and we compare them to…

fléche suivante Lire l'article complet