03.08.2018
Mot-clé : Peer review
31.07.2018
Beyond #FakeScience: How to Overcome Shallow Certainty in Scholarly Communication
« Science journalism in Germany in the last days was awash with a report on “predatory publishers” and an integrity ‘crisis’…30.07.2018
Reviewing the review process: Investigation of researchers’ opinions on different methods of peer review
« Peer review is considered the gold standard of scientific publishing. Trust in the traditional system of editor – blind-reviewer…29.06.2018
Preprints and peer review – feedback from the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMPP [video]
« Mary Yianni, Publisher at Taylor & Francis, reviews the different models of peer review and explains the…11.06.2018
Crossref facilitates the use of essential peer review information for scholarly communications
« The new exposure of peer review information through its public API provides opportunities for discoverability, analysis, and integration of tools.23.05.2018
Peer-review under review – A statistical study on proposal ranking at ESO. Part I: the pre-meeting phase
« Peer review is the most common mechanism in place for assessing requests for resources in a large variety of scientific…arxiv.org, Ferdinando Patat, 15 mai 2018, arXiv:1805.06981 [physics.soc-ph]
11.05.2018
Valoriser le travail des reviewers. Retours d’expérience de chercheurs sur le peer review, Publons
« Dans le cadre de la journée d’étude du 27 mars 2018 « Le peer review à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux…12.04.2018
Le « peer review » à l’ère de l’open science : enjeux et évolutions », Journée d’étude, Urfist, 27 mars 2018 [diaporamas]
« (…) Dans quelle mesure le paradigme de l’open science peut-il apporter des réponses à la crise du peer review ? Par…26.03.2018
PEERE International Conference on Peer Review, Rome, 7-9 March 2018 [diaporamas]
« Organised by COST Action PEERE, the conference offered scholars, practitioners and science stakeholders the…08.03.2018
Why We Need to Explore Blockchain Technology to Connect Researchers and Research
« (…) ORCID is eager to participate in projects that enrich the PID ecosystem. That includes looking at what…30.01.2018
OpenUP Pilot1: Open Peer Review for Conferences
« (…) An important aspect of the process of doing science is peer reviewing. It is one of the most important…15.12.2017
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
« Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of…14.11.2017
Un nouveau modèle de peer review testé par des revues Elsevier et Springer : RMR (Results Masked Reviews) ou RFR (Results Free Reviews) ?
« (…) Ce sont, encore une fois, des revues de psychologie et de management qui innovent. Le J…18.10.2017
The next stage of SocArXiv’s development: bringing greater transparency and efficiency to the peer review process
« Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platform has operated…28.07.2017
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
« Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the…19.06.2017
L’expertise en sciences ou comment se décide ce qui est publiable : noblesse et dérives
« (…) De plus en plus de manuscrits sont soumis pour publication, et l’éditeur est bien loin de connaître vraiment (scientifiquement,…13.06.2017
Peer Review Evaluation (PRE) and HighWire Press partner to increase transparency for peer review
« HighWire Press announces a partnership with Peer Review Evaluation (PRE) to offer turn-key integration of PRE, a transparency service from…06.06.2017
Web of Science owner buys up booming peer-review platform
« The owner of the vast science-citation database Web of Science — Clarivate Analytics — is buying up a firm that…29.05.2017
What might peer review look like in 2030?
« ‘What might peer review look like in 2030’ examines how peer review can be improved for future generations of academics and…16.05.2017
What it was like to be peer reviewed in the 1860s
« In January 1861 John Tyndall, a physicist at London’s Royal Institution, submitted a paper to the Philosophical Transactions of the…03.05.2017
OpenAIRE survey: open peer review is moving mainstream
« OpenAIRE today releases the results of its survey conducted in Autumn 2016, which gauged the views towards open peer review…28.04.2017
What is open peer review? A systematic review
“(…) Open peer review” (OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has neither a standardized definition nor an…f1000research.com, Ross-Hellauer T, 27 avril 2017, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.1
16.03.2017
Opening scholarly communication in social sciences by connecting collaborative authoring to peer review
« The objective of the OSCOSS research project on « Opening Scholarly Communication in the Social Sciences » is to build a coherent…09.02.2017
MIROR : découvrez cet excellent projet européen, et apprenez à bien organiser des Journal Clubs
« (…) Les Journal Clubs existent dans de nombreuses universités, et départements hospitaliers quand les praticiens, les chercheurs et…16.12.2016
Les anniversaires des revues sont des occasions : Academic Medicine a 90 ans et nous offre de bons articles
« Le 90ème anniversaire de la revue Academic Medicine permet d’avoir accès gracieusement aux articles sélectionnés par la rédaction.14.12.2016
mSphereDirect: Author-Initiated Peer Review of Manuscripts
« (…) With these two elements in hand—preprints and needed innovation in peer review—we have decided to embark on an experiment…27.10.2016
Artificial Intelligence Integration Allows Publishers a First Look at Meta Bibliometric Intelligence
« Aries Systems Corporation today announces the integration of Meta Bibliometric Intelligence into Editorial Manager, Aries’ industry-leading manuscript and…23.09.2016
Où publier : vers la reconnaissance du reviewing au Cirad
« Dans le cadre de la semaine Peer Review Week 2016 du 19 au 25 septembre, le…21.09.2016
EPRIST – Avec le brevet américain 9.430.468 , Elsevier se dote d’une arme défensive pour contrer à terme les logiques de peer – reviewing ouvert
« (…) Entre le développement d’une stratégie défensive de ses intérêts à long terme et la gestion à court terme de…eprist.fr, Michel Vajou, Analyse I/IST-n°20-14 septembre 2016
01.09.2016
Elsevier’s New Patent for Online Peer Review Throws a Scare Into Open-Source Advocates
« Patents on software can be controversial. And often, so is the company Elsevier, the giant journal publisher.27.07.2016
Over two thirds of researchers who’ve never peer reviewed would like to, new research reveals
« Published today is Peer review: a global view, bringing together primary research on researchers’ motivations behind…20.04.2016
The History of Scientific Publishing: An interview with Aileen Fyfe
« Have you ever wondered about the origins of scientific publishing, and how the field changed over time? In this…08.02.2016
Une nouvelle façon de publier la recherche ?
» Annoncé depuis quelques mois sur Twitter, RIO pour “Research Ideas and Outcomes” se présente comme un “journal” d’un genre…http://ist.blogs.inra.fr, Dominique L’Hostis, Marianne Peiffer et Sylvie Zasser, 03 fevrier 2016.
01.02.2016
Wiley survey examines how best to support peer reviewers
« The results of a recent survey to appear in Learned Publishing highlight how the peer review process—when research…18.01.2016
OpenEdition and OpenAIRE – experiments in open peer review
» As part of OpenAIRE2020, OpenEdition, in association with the Couperin consortium and the environmental…14.12.2015
Annotating the scholarly literature online by Lilian Nassi-Calò
« The Internet changed totally and irreversibly the way the scholarly literature is published, assessed, disseminated, read, shared and…08.12.2015
Dixième numéro de Publier la Science ! INRA
« Highlights : – Can a researcher have too many publications? – Open access is…28.05.2015
ORCID and F1000 partnered to develop a practical means to cite peer review activities
« Peer review is an essential component of the research and scholarly lifecycle. And yet, researcher peer review activities…02.04.2015
Concern raised over payment for fast-track peer review
« Some scientists are raising concerns over a pilot project that will allow researchers to pay for faster peer…20.03.2015
Could grant proposal reviews be made available openly?
« … This topic raises the attention of both the scientific community and civil society. For researchers, to ensure…20.03.2015
Wiley-Publons Pilot Program Enhances Peer-Reviewer Recognition
« … Publons works with reviewers, publishers, universities, and funding agencies to turn peer review into a measurable research output.22.09.2014
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies – Gallo SA, Carpenter AS, Irwin D, McPartland CD, Travis J, et al. (2014) (.pdf)
« Abstract There is a paucity of data in the literature concerning the validation of the grant…28.08.2014
Moving research forward: eLife announces the Research Advance
« eLife has introduced an innovative new type of article – the Research Advance – that invites the authors…11.07.2014
The rejection of metrics for the REF does not take account of existing problems of determining research quality
« Amidst heavy scepticism over the role of metrics in research assessments, Martin Smith [Professor of Politics at the University of…04.04.2014
OA: it’s not just about the access
« … Committees such as OASPA and COPE have been hard at work to outline the…04.10.2013